Before the "escape" of different means of the audotiría of OJD and of the measurement of Nielsen, I believe that we must bring in all the parts related in the publicity to do a serious reflection, because we are not speaking about 4 minor means, we are speaking about means that move a lot of money, impress many and with a wide tradition and trajectory commercializing his contents.
We might enter if really the information offered by OJD/Nielsen is useful:
For my point of view they are very useful but, in an environment where they had many other supports and not only mass media, there would be necessary a tool that really was helping me to plan my campaigns. A tool that was unfolding me the users, that he was saying all the traffic to me has proceeding from searchers, direct traffic, new users and appellants, … a tool that helps me to optimize the campaigns of my advertisers. To today OJD/Nielsen does not offer it.
But really is a tool of this type necessary?
Flatly yes.
For whom would this tool be useful?
For 10 % of the planners. I believe that nevertheless I have been an optimist. Gentlemen, let's not deceive, how are the campaigns of “banners“ planned? To the buy to “bulk of impressions“. To that the advertiser begins demanding to obtain certain quality impressions, "rankeadores" of traffic as Site Census is at present OJD +, etc, they will not serve to me for anything, with the current information that are offered, as well as the work of many faced to the buy wholesale of impressions will be completely useless.
OJD+Nielsen have a serious problem of sum of traffic of networks that are not of property of the client, that if any of them boast of “getting it” to the OJD taking into account traffic that is not, etc.
This is "spam" for today famine for tomorrow.
Where do I go, the thief always goes ahead of the police, we all know this; does the virus always go out firstly and later the antivirus, is the OJD for it a bad system? Sincerely, I believe that not.
But remember a thing, the pitfalls are ILLEGAL, if we all do pitfalls really the one who loses is not the OJD because late in detecting them, if not the sector.
In my case, in certain occasions do I buy impressions for certain clients, if I know that a way is adding traffic thanks to a legal gap in the OJD regulation (according to my criterion), do not I buy impressions in this way, why do others do it?
It is not important for all of us to gain a party for unjust penalty, but nobody likes losing it; porqué do we have to do pitfalls and blame the umpire? is not he the "delinquent" the one that does pitfalls?
The same way I remember that at least in the OJD, Nielsen the desconzco, it is formed also by the means in his committee, someone it will be these means that do pitfalls.
Where must it improve the alliance OJD/Nielsen?
To be much more rapid, we are in an extremely dynamic sector, turning the similar football supporter, the umpire cannot be obese or have on weight, must be in form, to be rapid and to take decisions agreed with the different sectors quickly. As well as communicative, the silence conceals things, be already truths or lies, major communication. Google has a blog of his principal hardware, idem for OJD/Nielsen. Rapidity, communication and transparence.
And to all this Google Adplanner keeps on offering very useful and free information!!